This entry is a few half thought through musings I’ve had over the last few months. None of them are sufficiently significant to stand alone as a blog, but I am hoping that the whole transpires to be greater than the sum of its parts.
Thoughtful Gifts are the Ultimate Expression of Passive Aggression
A few weeks or months ago (timeline changed to protect identities), I chanced to be at a friend’s birthday dinner. Everyone was having a lovely time, but there was the threat of some tension as we knew that someone who had been invited out of politeness, rather than genuine affection, was due to arrive imminently. There had been bad blood between the birthday-celebrator and this person and, though a fragile truce had been agreed, it was very early days. The as yet unarrived guest felt wronged, terribly so, and had brooded stubbornly for quite some time until, recognising that this strategy wasn’t working, they had eventually waved a tiny white flag.
A couple of cocktails later and we had all almost forgotten that this person might be coming, but then they appeared. Suddenly. As if with a puff of purple smoke in a cheap Halloween horror. All chatter stopped. Cigarette ends stopped flickering. We waited. Then came the gift.
The gift was self consciously thoughtful, chosen because it alluded to 3 separate nuggets of information gleaned about our host. Whilst listening to the reasoning behind the choice of gift – something that should, by all rights, be patently obvious in any genuine thoughtful gift giving scenario – it hit me: this was passive aggression par excellence. This was quiet and smug moral victory at last.
A guy I was dating a while ago – he always maintained it wasn’t dating but as a final two fingers up to him I shall evermore refer to it both as dating and as a horrendous error of judgement – was irked when I decided it would be best to stop speaking to him. He thought he had earned my everlasting (and misguided) devotion after he provided a series of thoughtful – and paid in full – gestures and experiences. He could not understand that thoughtfulness, or, in his case, remembering stuff that I had said, does not equate with debt. That is what the passive aggressive thoughtful gift giver seeks: a debt that must be repaid with contrition, gratitude and continued affection.
6 weeks into my silence, the guy sent me a text message on my birthday telling me he had bought me “a thoughtful birthday present” and asking where he should send it. I am ashamed to say that his move worked – i am a sucker for a present – and I broke my silence. To this day I don’t know what the gift was, or whether it even existed. The suggestion of the ‘thoughtful gift’ was his attack and he moved away back into the shadows of the internet satisfied that he had hit his mark.
So beware the thoughtful gift, it just might be their way of saying ‘you owe me’.
The Advert I’d Love to Put in a Lonely Hearts/On a Dating Website but I Fear the Weirdos
Ardent and mercurial feminist seeks emotionally unavailable but loyal and faithful man for frequent dinners, dates and holidays at her convenience. Must be intelligent, witty and able to read minds. Degree, job and own home preferred. No misogynists, indie boys suffering from arrested development or people who hold the view that one must continue to try olives until one is sufficiently old and sophisticated enough to appreciate them.
Why I Hate Blurred Lines So Much
Blurred Lines is undoubtedly catchy – Thicke’s deranged oscillation between earth trembling bass and glass shattering falsetto means we have all of the best of Barry White and Prince (with a bit of Orson) in one song. It is precisely this catchiness that makes me hate it SO much. I hate it because I enjoy hearing it. If I block out the hatefully misogynistic lyrics, it’s a fun piece of music to put on the radio and dance about to. I hate it because it represents the very thing that its lyrics espouse: you don’t like it, but you love it really. The ‘I know you want it’ could refer just as much to the unwilling ultimate submission to the catchiness of the song as to the voiceless female victim of the arrogant male lyricist. I don’t want to listen to it, it makes me exceptionally angry to do so, but I don’t switch it off because the melody casts some sort of spell over me. And the more I think about it, the more I wonder: Is Robin Thicke clever? Did he do this on purpose? Did he deliberately create a date rape anthem that was so creepily anthemic that people would despise the lyrics but enjoy the melody, thus creating a profound marriage of form and content? I see the game he is playing – he’s Richard III, he’s Petruchio, he’s Alan Rickman as the Sheriff of Nottingham… But there’s nothing remotely sexy about this villain. So there are no blurred lines Robin, she just doesn’t actually want you at all.






